Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Response from James Richards, Baron Traders: “I would therefore ask that this link is removed ASAP”

Posted on 4 October 201322 July 2015
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

In August 2013, REDD-Monitor wrote about a company called Baron Traders, a Gibraltar registered company that sold carbon credits as investments. Much of the post was based on a series of articles written in 2011 by Richard Smith on the Naked Capitalism website.

A little over one month after the post on REDD-Monitor, I received an email from James Richards, Director of Baron Traders. “Obviously this posting is now having a drastic and detrimental effect on our business both in terms of reputation and economy,” Richards wrote. Which is perhaps surprising, considering that Naked Capitalism is a far more popular website than REDD-Monitor, and the only two pieces of information I added to Smith’s series of articles were that James Richards’ company is now operating under the name Baron Traders instead of Verified Carbon Credits, and that on its website Baron Traders was suggesting an average price for CERs of €14.69 (bizarrely based on predictions of the price for 2013). When I wrote about Baron Traders, CERs were selling at €0.57 on the European Energy Exchange, and the price now is €0.62.

Here’s the email from James Richards:

From: James jr@barontraders.com
Date: 19 September 2013 14:35
Subject: Redd Monitor
To: reddmonitor@gmail.com
 
Dear Mr Lang
 
I am writing in regard to the following link http://redd-monitor.org/2013/08/16/baron-traders-ltd-another-scam-company-offering-carbon-credits-as-investments/ which was brought to our attention by a long standing business associate. Obviously this posting is now having a drastic and detrimental effect on our business both in terms of reputation and economy.
 
Under your Comments policy point 3 I can confirm there are a number of points which are extremely libellous and defamatory and would therefore ask that this link is removed ASAP
 
Should you require further clarification we are more than willing to provide what ever is required and have a telephone conversation
 
Best regards
 

When James Richards commented on Richard Smith’s article on the Naked Capitalism website, Smith’s rigorous response came under the headline, “Moron from Scam Companies ‘Validated Carbon Credits’ and ‘Baron Traders Limited’ Threatens This Blog”.

Until now, I haven’t responded to Richards’ email. I don’t require “further clarification” – reading Baron Traders’ corporate brochure (pdf file, 725.1 KB) and website leaves little room for doubt that the company was at least attempting to sell carbon credits as investments, using a series of misleading statements.

Here, for example, is one of the misleading statements from Baron Traders’ brochure: “Market volumes and price forecasts for CERs are encouraging with significant growth expected between now and 2020.” This may have been true before the financial crisis started in 2008, but today it is pure fiction. A press release from Point Carbon, released a few months after Baron Traders’ brochure, predicts a fall in the price of CERs:

Thomson Reuters Point Carbon predicts sCER prices will average €1.6/t during phase 3 of the EU ETS, less than half its previous forecast. To 2014, Thomson Reuters Point Carbon predicts sCER prices will average €2.5/t, falling to €1/t in 2018 and 2019, and to 50 cents in 2020 due to the oversupply. The low price for sCERs may mean that investment in emission reduction projects under the CDM will dry up over the coming years.

In the disclaimer following his email to REDD-Monitor, Richards provides an email address for Baron Traders. But clicking on it brings up an email address for a company called Oakmount and Partners Ltd, whose website is “coming soon”. The website already includes the following warning:

Buying Investments can involve risk. The value of your Investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed at any time.
 
You may get back less than you originally invested and in extreme circumstances, lose all of the value of your investment.

Meanwhile, Baron Traders has redesigned its website. No longer offering carbon credits as investments, the website announces that, “Currency Trading is the largest market in the world…”. I’ll leave you to make up your own mind up about whether this is another scam. “Minimum trade 10k – clients are accepted on a case-by-case basis.” Here’s a screenshot:


 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

4 thoughts on “Response from James Richards, Baron Traders: “I would therefore ask that this link is removed ASAP””

  1. Derrick Wilkinson says:
    4 October 2013 at 5:25 pm

    It’s all the more annoying to see just how easily people like you and Richard Smith can raise serious questions about an apparently scam operation, yet we spend £millions to have regulators that appear to be incompetent and/or ineffective. An investigation into why the regulators are not dealing with this would seem to be urgently needed.

  2. Roger Watson says:
    4 October 2013 at 6:43 pm

    Precisely the same tactics used by Pure Carbon/Clear View (the same company). When I started raising a legal case against them and contributing to this blog they phoned me to say that I was damaging their ability to conduct their business and that major customers such as Newcastle FC and Mercedes would stop traiding with them. I assume that these statement are simply nonsense.

  3. Mike says:
    4 October 2013 at 7:07 pm

    A regulator for the regulators perhaps? Unbelievably, after all we now know about Carbon Credits being entirely unsuitable for personal investment they remain SIPP compliant.

  4. Dan says:
    7 October 2013 at 5:40 pm

    I got a call from these saying that it was fully FCA compliant and RDR ready. When asked about how and in what form the investor had protection she just said because they are RDR ready. Ha!! Then she starts harping on about commissions that they pay the adviser! Idiots.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“Unfortunately, and despite years of debate within the environmental policy community, there is no commonly held precise understanding of what additionality means or how to best implement it.”

— Michael Gillenwater, Greenhouse Gas Management Institute, January 2012

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Minus: New report reveals the reality of REDD in Mai Ndombe, Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits

Recent Comments

  • j'accuse on The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!