Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Climate change is “unequivocal” says the IPCC. Could someone tell the UNFCCC?

Posted on 27 September 20132 April 2014
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

This morning in Stockholm, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released the first part of its fifth assessment report (AR5). “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal,” the IPCC states in its Summary for Policymakers.

The IPCC report released today is from Working Group I – a team of scientists looking at the physical science of climate change. The Working Group has met 12 times since 2010, and received a total of more than 50,000 comments on the two draft versions of its report.

The IPCC reports that, “The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased.” The period 1983 to 2012 was likely the warmest 30-year period in the last 1400 years in the Northern Hemisphere. Arctic sea ice and Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking. Sea level is rising. The level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is “unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years”.

Perhaps the scariest statement is this: “Most aspects of climate change will persist for many centuries even if emissions of CO2 are stopped.”

Kevin Anderson, Professor of Energy and Climate Change at the Tyndale Centre at the University of Manchester, is one of the UK’s leading climate scientists. In an interview with Friends of the Earth, he describes the IPCC report as “essential”.

“With climate change, what we’ve got is a huge wealth of scientific endeavour and the IPCC process is the only body that is able to bring that together, and then scrutinize it word by word, line by line, argument by argument. We’ve never seen that level of scrutiny over any other scientific domain before. And without something like the IPCC I think we would not have a collective understanding of what the consensus is, what the wealth of science is telling us. So I think it is a really essential part of the climate change story.”

In its new report, the IPCC explains what should, by now, be obvious:

Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and changes in all components of the climate system. Limiting climate change will require substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.

The body responsible for achieving this is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It’s been meeting since 1992. So far it has spectacularly failed to achieve “substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions”.

Here’s Kevin Anderson again:

Since the [IPCC’s] last report in 2007, we’ve put up around about 200 billion tons of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. 200 billion tons….
Since the first report in about 1990, we’ve almost doubled our emissions. So the trend line for the emissions is for me where the real interests lie in that what we are seeing there are very rapid increases in emissions. No sign of those emissions coming back down. And any changes in the science are effectively just noise in the system compared with the real change which relates to the emissions that continue to be put in the atmosphere.

This year’s Conference of Parties to the UNFCCC will take place in Warsaw in Poland. The Polish government is organising a “International Coal and Climate Summit” to run in parallel to COP19. The meeting will take place in Poland’s Ministry of Economy.

But the meeting will not be looking at ways to stop burning coal. It’s organised with the World Coal Association, which proposes continuing burning coal as a way of addressing climate change. Renaming “coal” as “clean coal” is about the only acknowledgement that the World Coal Association makes of the dangers of climate change.

Claude Turmes, MEP and vice-chair of the European Parliament Green group told EurActiv,

“The Polish government is transforming something of international importance into a lobby opportunity for coal, the very energy which destroys climate the most…. Clean coal is a climate killer full-stop.”

As if that wasn’t bad enough, among the sponsors of COP19 are such paragons of sustainability as ArcelorMittal, International Paper, BMW, General Motors, PGE Polish Energy Group, and Polish Airlines.

ArcelorMittal is presumably just returning a favour. ArcelorMittal is the world’s biggest steel company and the EU’s fifth biggest greenhouse gas polluter. But instead of asking the company to cut its emissions, the EU handed over millions of carbon permits through its Emissions Trading System. By 2011, according to environmental NGO Sandbag, ArcelorMittal had a carbon permit surplus worth US$2.4 billion. The value of these permits has fallen since 2011, but in 2012, ArcelorMittal earned US$200 million from sales of pollution permits.

While COP19’s doors are open wide to polluting industry, places for observer organisations have been cut back. Several civil society groups have received less than half their usual number of places.

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

1 thought on “Climate change is “unequivocal” says the IPCC. Could someone tell the UNFCCC?”

  1. Chris Lang says:
    27 September 2013 at 10:03 pm

    US climate scientist Michael Mann reckons the IPCC doesn’t go far enough (via LinkTV).

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“We have quite enough national parks, we have quite enough locked-up forests already. In fact, in an important respect, we have too much locked-up forest. So my friends, when I say that I want Australia to be open for business, I mean open for business for the forestry industry.”

— Tony Abbott, Prime Minister of Australia, March 2014

Recent Posts

  • The Durban Declaration on Carbon Trading
  • Book review: “Forest Conservation and Sustainability in Indonesia” by Bernice Maxton-Lee
  • Plant for the Planet: Felix Finkbeiner’s fake forests
  • Open letter to the lead authors of ‘Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature’: “This paper reads to us like a proposal for a new model of colonialism”
  • Robert Walker predicts Amazon tipping point by 2064

Recent Comments

  • Erin on Savraj Gata-Aura sentenced to four years in prison for his role in the Bar Works investment scam
  • Lesley Walford on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Vic on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Juana Vera-Delgado on Open letter to the lead authors of ‘Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature’: “This paper reads to us like a proposal for a new model of colonialism”
  • Melanie Sage on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!