Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Singapore chokes on haze from Sumatra fires. Again. Wasn’t REDD supposed to stop this?

Posted on 25 June 20136 August 2015

Last week, the pollution from fires in Sumatra set new records. The smoke in Singapore this year is worse than it was in 1997 and 2002, both years of major forest burning in Indonesia.

World Resources Institute has produced an analysis of where the fires are, based on NASA’s Active Fire Data and the Ministry of Forestry’s concession maps. WRI found that most of the fires are in Riau province, and almost half are inside concessions for oil palm plantations or industrial tree plantations. According to the data, the largest number of fires are within concessions belonging to the Sinar Mas and Raja Garuda Mas (RGM) groups.

Indonesia’s coordinating minister for people’s welfare, Agung Laksono, is the minister responsible for coordinating Indonesia’s response. He seems to have failed to grasp the seriousness of the problem.

“Singapore should not be behaving like a child and making all this noise,” he said at a press conference on Thursday.

He also seems to have missed the point that these fires are started deliberately. “This is not what the Indonesian nation wants,” Laksono said, “it is because of nature.”

He added that Indonesia wasn’t looking for small amounts of money to help address the fires. “If it is only half a million, or one million dollars, we don’t need that. We would rather use our own national budget,” he said.

Laksono also seems not to have heard about the US$1 billion REDD deal signed in 2010 between Indonesia and Norway. Except that, of course, the moratorium, which was recently extended for another two years, doesn’t apply to existing concessions.

In 2011, Hadi Daryanto, Indonesia’s Forestry Ministry general secretary, commented that the “Moratorium does not affect investment.” He said this just after the ministry had handed out more than 370,000 hectares of concessions in a six month period.

“We have considered creating artificial rain to put out the fires, but that would take two weeks,” he said, as reported by the Jakarta Post. “So we’ve decided to leave it in the hands of nature. And let’s just pray for that.” And if praying doesn’t work? “If there is no downpour then the haze could last for weeks, or even months, as we try to generate artificial rain.”

Daryanto also pointed out that Singaporean and Malaysian companies were involved in the palm oil industry in Sumatra:

“The slash-and-burn technique being used is the cheapest land-clearing method and it is not only used by local farmers, but also employees of palm oil investors including Singaporean and Malaysian companies…. We hope the governments of Malaysia and Singapore will tell their investors to adopt proper measures so we can solve this problem together.”

Associated Press reports that Indonesia’s president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono apologised yesterday to Singapore and Malaysia for the pollution. “For what is happening, as the president, I apologize to our brothers in Singapore and Malaysia,” Yudhoyono said. “There should be a thorough investigation. In my analysis, there are both natural and human factors.”

Many of the fires in NASA’s satellite images are in concessions run by companies that supply Asia Pulp and Paper, part of the Sinar Mas Group. APP sent a statement to mongabay.com, in which it states that only seven of the 74 hotspots in its suppliers’ concessions are actually forest fires. APP “remains 100 percent committed to its zero deforestation policy”, the company stated.

In 2001, Indonesia passed a law (Government Regulation 4/2001) that forbids all forest and land fires. In a 2003 report, titled “Fires in Indonesia”, Luca Tacconi of CIFOR commented that, “It is obvious that just revising the legislation will not solve fire related problems. The laws need to be enforced and this is not occurring.”

Tacconi also recommended different strategies for dealing with breaches of the law by companies and by farmers:

  • Companies: “to effect a change in the use of fires by companies, clear punitive examples need to be set, meaning that companies using fire unlawfully need to be prosecuted, if found guilty the penalties imposed need to be sufficiently large to act as a deterrent.”
  • Farmers: “when livelihood activities are involved in a fire or smoke haze problem, only community-based initiatives, backed by legislative means, have any likelihood of succeeding.”

Yesterday, Indonesian police arrested two farmers for illegally starting fires in Sumatra. A spokesperson for the police said that,

“We arrested two farmers in Riau who were clearing their land by burning. They were not working for anyone but just clearing their own land.”

 


PHOTO Credit: Smoke Engulfs Singapore, NASA.
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!