Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

The Guna General Congress rejects REDD in Guna Yala territory, Panama

Posted on 17 June 201326 September 2013

The Guna General Congress has taken the decision to reject all REDD projects in Guna Yala territory in Panama and specifically to reject a proposed project by Wildlife Works Carbon, a US-based REDD project developer.

The Guna General Congress took place in the community of Muladub from 6-9 June 2013. Delegates from all 51 communities in Guna Yala took part, including two non-indigenous communities. One of the key issues for the Congress was whether to accept or reject the Wildlife Works Carbon REDD pilot project in the Guna Yala territory.

Wildlife Works Carbon presented its proposed project to the Guna General Congress in October 2011. Public consultations about the project, organised by the Research and Development Institute of Kuna Yala, finished in April 2013.

On the Amanecer Indigena blog, Guna indigenous lawyer Atencio López notes that,

At the end of the discussion, a representative of Wildlife Works Carbon thanked the Congress for the opportunity provided by the Gunas and said he accepts and respects the sovereign decision adopted by the Gunas.

The Guna General Congress also went a step further and prohibited anything to do with REDD in Guna Yala.

The resolution from the Guna General Congress is posted in full here, with the original in Spanish below.

Resolution No. 5


The Guna General Congress in its ordinary session held in the community of Sasardi Muladub, on June 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th, 2013, wielding the legal powers vested in it by the Fundamental Law and Bylaws of the Comarca, issued the following resolution.

Considering:

That since 2011, the U.S. company Wildlife Works Carbon (WWC) presented its proposal on the design and joint implementation of the REDD+ pilot project in the Gunayala Comarca to the Guna General Congress for its approval or rejection;

That broad consultations were held with the communities of the Comarca on numerous occasions until this phase was exhausted and [the matter] was brought to the plenary of the General Assembly for its approval or rejection;

Resolves:

First: The general assembly of the Guna General Congress rejects by absolute majority the project “design and joint implementation of the REDD+ pilot project in the Gunayala Comarca” and decides to shelve it.

Second: The Guna General Congress withdraws from all discussions at the national and international level on the REDD+ issue, until what time as the Congress makes another decision on the matter.

Third: All the Guna national or international governmental and non-governmental organizations are prohibited from organizing events, conferences, workshops and other activities on the issue, [or risk being] sanctioned in accordance with our bylaws and Fundamental Law.

Issued in the community of Sasardi Muladub, Gunayala Comarca, on the 9th day of the month of June, two thousand and thirteen (2013).


PHOTO Credit: Guna Yala – Tides Blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!