Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

COONAPIP to take out lawsuit to stop REDD in Panama: “REDD cannot continue as it stands”

Posted on 29 May 201329 May 2013

In February 2013, the National Coordinating Body of Indigenous Peoples in Panama, COONAPIP, withdrew from UN-REDD. In a letter to UN-REDD, COONAPIP explained that, UN-REDD “does not currently offer guarantees for respecting indigenous rights [nor for] the full and effective participation of the Indigenous Peoples of Panama”.

“We thought REDD was going to help us strengthen our rights over our territories because no one looks after the forests like we do,” Betanio Chiquidama, the head of COONAPIP told the Guardian last week. “It sought to do the opposite and we have lost all trust in the UN.”

COONAPIP is now planning to bring a lawsuit against Panamanian National Environmental Authority in an attempt to stop REDD, according to an IPS report that quotes Héctor Huertas of the National Union of Indigenous Lawyers of Panama (UNAIPA), which represents COONAPIP.

The lawsuit will use the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peopes, which includes Indigenous Peoples’ right to free, prior and informed consent. Mongabay reports that a statement issued on behalf of COONAPIP explains that the lawsuit will be,

“the first major test of a key provision of the 2007 UN Declaration, which says indigenous peoples have the right to refuse projects and investments—such as logging and mining operations—that affect the natural resources in their territories.”

In response to COONAPIP’s letter, UN-REDD suspended all new activities in Panama and launched an evaluation of the UN-REDD programme in the country. The evaluation report is due to be completed on 24 June 2013.

Gabriel Labbate is the UN’s regional REDD co-ordinator. He believes COONAPIP’s withdrawal had more to do with demands for more money and internal indigenous politics over who controlled which projects,” the Guardian reported. Labbate told the Guardian that COONAPIP’s withdrawal from UN-REDD,

“fits into the more complex context of the conflicts between the indigenous groups and the government in Panama, which goes much further than just REDD.”

The government environment agency did not respond to the Guardian‘s questions.

Hector González, COONAPIP’s lawyer, points out that REDD is itself part of the problem. “It is a new form of colonisation,” he told the Guardian. “The government has always seen the land solely from a commercial point of view, and the UN doesn’t understand the indigenous issue.”

“When it comes to the forests of Panama, we are not mere stakeholders to be consulted”, says Betanio Chiquidama, COONAPIP’s president.

2013-05-29-125625_354x396_scrot“More than half the country’s forests are on the lands of indigenous people. How can an effective plan to save these forests be negotiated if the indigenous leaders are not at the table?

“The pressure on the forests has never been greater – for food, fuel, fibre and mineral exploration. But we also know that there are other lands that could be used for these purposes; the answer is not to kill our forests.”

Chiquidama is not opposed to REDD, but he is opposed to the way it has been implemented in Panama. In a press release earlier this month, he explained that,

“We are not radicalized against REDD program, but it cannot continue as it stands. Our approach is to redesign, with real indigenous participation mechanisms, in order to be respectful of our culture, and make it stronger, rather than weaken.”

The REDD debacle in Panama is very important, for at least two reasons.

The first reason, as explained by Christine Halvorson, of the Rainforest Foundation US, is that,

“Any plan aimed at reducing climate change should strengthen the rights of the indigenous people to the forests that are central to their lives and livelihoods. Without the participation of those most likely to be impacted, efforts to save the world’s forests likely will fail.”

The second reason, as pointed out by Andrew Davis of the Salvadoran Program for Research on Development and Environment (PRISMA), is that,

“In theory, implementing REDD readiness in Panama should have been easier than most, given the strength of its indigenous peoples and their success in forest management. It should be a red flag that REDD has run into such serious problems related to the participation of indigenous peoples.”


PHOTO Credit: From a poster by COONAPIP, displayed at a meeting with UN-REDD in May 2013. It reads “Without rights, No REDD! Mother Earth has rights!” Alianza Mesoamericana

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!