Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court returns customary forests to indigenous peoples

Posted on 17 May 201325 September 2016

Yesterday, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court ruled that indigenous peoples’ customary forests should not be classed as “State Forest Areas”. This is a landmark ruling and an important step for the recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights in Indonesia.

In March 2012, Indonesia’s national indigenous peoples’ organisation, AMAN (Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara), filed a petition to the Court. Yesterday’s ruling is a response to AMAN’s petition.

Indonesia’s 1999 Forestry Law previously stated that “customary forests are state forests located in the areas of custom-based communities”. The Constitutional Court’s ruling deletes the word “state” from that sentence. The ruling revised the Law so that state forests no longer include customary forests.


UPDATE – 21 May 2013: The Constitutional Court’s review of the 1999 Forest Law is available here (pdf file, 973.7 kB, in Bahasa Indonesia).


A film produced last year by Telapak and Gekko Studio explains the importance of forests for Indonesia’s indigenous peoples:

AMAN’s press release on the Constitutional Court ruling is posted below.

Constitutional Court Agrees on Judicial Review of UUK

 
AMAN press release 16 May 2013
 
Jakarta, 16 May 2013 – Constitutional Court has accepted the Judicial Review of some parts of Act No. 41/1999 on Forestry (Undang-Undang Kehutanan or UUK) submitted by the Indigenous Peoples’ Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), Thursday (16/5).
 
Although the Court didn’t agree on all requested reviews, AMAN warmly welcomes the decision announced in Plenary Hall of Constitutional Court. This ruling means that the Indigenous Peoples of the Archipelago are legal subjects and customary forests are not State forests. Hence Indigenous Peoples will get back their rights over their customary forests seized by the State through UUK.
 
“AMAN submitted the judicial review in March 2012 and its series of sessions ended in June. Good things come to those who wait. About 40 millions Indigenous Peoples now are rightful over our customary forests because the State has become unable to expel us out of our customary forests that have become our source of livelihood from generation to generation,” said Secretary-General of AMAN Abdon Nababan.
 
AMAN perceives that the UUK was deliberately legalized to take over customary forests and give them to capital owners through various license schemes. These so-called legal seizures practically happen on all around Indonesia.
 
The exploitation of customary forests has been proven threatening to the sustainability of Indigenous Peoples and damaging environment. Both the Ministry of Forestry and Statistics Indonesia (BPS) show that there are 31,957 interacting with forests and 71.06 percent of them heavily depend on forest resources.
 
UUK is not the only Act violating Indigenous Peoples’ rights over their customary forests. Last month the House of Representatives secretly discussed the Draft Act on Eradication of Deforestation (RUU P2H) potentially criminalizing Indigenous Peoples whose livelihoods heavily depending on forests.
 
“Holding onto Constitutional Court’s ruling today, AMAN will keep fighting for Indigenous Peoples to get back our rights over our customary forests that have become our source of livelihood from generation to generation,” added Abdon Nababan.
 

 

8 thoughts on “Indonesia’s Constitutional Court returns customary forests to indigenous peoples”

  1. Carolyn Marr says:
    17 May 2013 at 5:50 pm

    Thanks for highlighting this news Chris, and for the link to the film. Could I also highlight the AMAN-DTE book highlighting indigenous forest management ‘Forests for the Future’, written by indigenous communities across Indonesia and including contributions from Sumatra, NTT, NTB, Sulawesi, Kalimantan and Java. The link to the online version is:

    Forests for the Future: Indigenous Forest Management in a Changing World

  2. Carolyn Marr says:
    21 May 2013 at 6:24 pm

    The Indonesian online edition of this book has just been posted on our site too: here, with Press Release here.

  3. Genus Animaus says:
    23 May 2013 at 4:39 pm

    Personally I don’t think that a simply court rule will automatically make things better especially considering the high levels of corruption within the country’s forestry system and also Indonesia’s terrible treatment of its indigenous peoples especially in West Papua. Here’s the latest post in my blog where I explain more about this.
    http://finalrationalist.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/indonesias-indigenous-peoples-wins-court-rule-regarding-land-rights-but-skepticism-needs-to-remain/

  4. Simone Vezzani says:
    23 May 2013 at 8:16 pm

    Thank you very much for this interesting news. I am an Italian researcher in International Law. I would be very interested in reading the decision by the Indonesian Constitutional Court, which is here available in the original version. Do you know where I may find an English (French or Spanish) translation?

  5. Chris Lang says:
    23 May 2013 at 9:23 pm

    @Simone Vezzani (#5) – I’m sorry, I’m not aware of any translations of the document. If I hear of a translation (or summary reports), I’ll post them.

  6. www.tnrlawfirm.com says:
    28 November 2013 at 7:31 am

    @Simone Vezzani – you could download the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision in English version here: http://www.aman.or.id/wp-content/plugins/downloads-manager/upload/Constitutional_Court_Ruling_16_May_2013.pdf

  7. Chris Lang says:
    28 November 2013 at 9:27 am

    @www.tnrlawfirm.com (#6) – Thanks for this!

  8. Simone Vezzani says:
    28 November 2013 at 7:46 pm

    Thank you very much for the link!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!