Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court returns customary forests to indigenous peoples

Posted on 17 May 201325 September 2016

Yesterday, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court ruled that indigenous peoples’ customary forests should not be classed as “State Forest Areas”. This is a landmark ruling and an important step for the recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights in Indonesia.

In March 2012, Indonesia’s national indigenous peoples’ organisation, AMAN (Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara), filed a petition to the Court. Yesterday’s ruling is a response to AMAN’s petition.

Indonesia’s 1999 Forestry Law previously stated that “customary forests are state forests located in the areas of custom-based communities”. The Constitutional Court’s ruling deletes the word “state” from that sentence. The ruling revised the Law so that state forests no longer include customary forests.


UPDATE – 21 May 2013: The Constitutional Court’s review of the 1999 Forest Law is available here (pdf file, 973.7 kB, in Bahasa Indonesia).


A film produced last year by Telapak and Gekko Studio explains the importance of forests for Indonesia’s indigenous peoples:

AMAN’s press release on the Constitutional Court ruling is posted below.

Constitutional Court Agrees on Judicial Review of UUK

 
AMAN press release 16 May 2013
 
Jakarta, 16 May 2013 – Constitutional Court has accepted the Judicial Review of some parts of Act No. 41/1999 on Forestry (Undang-Undang Kehutanan or UUK) submitted by the Indigenous Peoples’ Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), Thursday (16/5).
 
Although the Court didn’t agree on all requested reviews, AMAN warmly welcomes the decision announced in Plenary Hall of Constitutional Court. This ruling means that the Indigenous Peoples of the Archipelago are legal subjects and customary forests are not State forests. Hence Indigenous Peoples will get back their rights over their customary forests seized by the State through UUK.
 
“AMAN submitted the judicial review in March 2012 and its series of sessions ended in June. Good things come to those who wait. About 40 millions Indigenous Peoples now are rightful over our customary forests because the State has become unable to expel us out of our customary forests that have become our source of livelihood from generation to generation,” said Secretary-General of AMAN Abdon Nababan.
 
AMAN perceives that the UUK was deliberately legalized to take over customary forests and give them to capital owners through various license schemes. These so-called legal seizures practically happen on all around Indonesia.
 
The exploitation of customary forests has been proven threatening to the sustainability of Indigenous Peoples and damaging environment. Both the Ministry of Forestry and Statistics Indonesia (BPS) show that there are 31,957 interacting with forests and 71.06 percent of them heavily depend on forest resources.
 
UUK is not the only Act violating Indigenous Peoples’ rights over their customary forests. Last month the House of Representatives secretly discussed the Draft Act on Eradication of Deforestation (RUU P2H) potentially criminalizing Indigenous Peoples whose livelihoods heavily depending on forests.
 
“Holding onto Constitutional Court’s ruling today, AMAN will keep fighting for Indigenous Peoples to get back our rights over our customary forests that have become our source of livelihood from generation to generation,” added Abdon Nababan.
 

 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

8 thoughts on “Indonesia’s Constitutional Court returns customary forests to indigenous peoples”

  1. Carolyn Marr says:
    17 May 2013 at 5:50 pm

    Thanks for highlighting this news Chris, and for the link to the film. Could I also highlight the AMAN-DTE book highlighting indigenous forest management ‘Forests for the Future’, written by indigenous communities across Indonesia and including contributions from Sumatra, NTT, NTB, Sulawesi, Kalimantan and Java. The link to the online version is:

    Forests for the Future: Indigenous Forest Management in a Changing World

  2. Carolyn Marr says:
    21 May 2013 at 6:24 pm

    The Indonesian online edition of this book has just been posted on our site too: here, with Press Release here.

  3. Genus Animaus says:
    23 May 2013 at 4:39 pm

    Personally I don’t think that a simply court rule will automatically make things better especially considering the high levels of corruption within the country’s forestry system and also Indonesia’s terrible treatment of its indigenous peoples especially in West Papua. Here’s the latest post in my blog where I explain more about this.
    http://finalrationalist.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/indonesias-indigenous-peoples-wins-court-rule-regarding-land-rights-but-skepticism-needs-to-remain/

  4. Simone Vezzani says:
    23 May 2013 at 8:16 pm

    Thank you very much for this interesting news. I am an Italian researcher in International Law. I would be very interested in reading the decision by the Indonesian Constitutional Court, which is here available in the original version. Do you know where I may find an English (French or Spanish) translation?

  5. Chris Lang says:
    23 May 2013 at 9:23 pm

    @Simone Vezzani (#5) – I’m sorry, I’m not aware of any translations of the document. If I hear of a translation (or summary reports), I’ll post them.

  6. www.tnrlawfirm.com says:
    28 November 2013 at 7:31 am

    @Simone Vezzani – you could download the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision in English version here: http://www.aman.or.id/wp-content/plugins/downloads-manager/upload/Constitutional_Court_Ruling_16_May_2013.pdf

  7. Chris Lang says:
    28 November 2013 at 9:27 am

    @www.tnrlawfirm.com (#6) – Thanks for this!

  8. Simone Vezzani says:
    28 November 2013 at 7:46 pm

    Thank you very much for the link!!!!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Kay on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Ian on Oakmount Management Partners, Oakwood Financial Management, Oakmount and Partners, Baron Traders, Emerald Knight, Oakmount Global Management, MH Carbon, DMD Media, Morgan Forbes, and Centrium Capital Markets: A network of scam companies
  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme

Recent Posts

  • Indigenous Sengwer urge donors “to stop funding conservation projects that are stealing our land and destroying our life”
  • The return of the Kamula Doso REDD project in Papua New Guinea: This time run by Mayur Resources, a mining company, and Santos, an oil and gas company
  • Oakland Institute and Survival International call on UNESCO and IUCN to cut ties with the Tanzanian government over the most recent human rights abuses against the Maasai in Loliondo
  • Statement from Kichwa Indigenous communities about the Cordillera Azul National Park REDD (PNCAZ) project: “No to the false climate solutions offered as ‘Nature Based Solutions’ and ‘carbon neutrality’ by oil and mining companies that pollute in other regions of the world, such as Shell, Total, BHP, and others, who buy carbon from the PNCAZ.”
  • 30×30 target “not supported by the science”

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Kay on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Ian on Oakmount Management Partners, Oakwood Financial Management, Oakmount and Partners, Baron Traders, Emerald Knight, Oakmount Global Management, MH Carbon, DMD Media, Morgan Forbes, and Centrium Capital Markets: A network of scam companies
  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!