Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Gas extraction and REDD in Peru: You can’t have your cake and eat it

Posted on 14 February 201319 July 2016

Gas extraction and REDD in Peru: You can't have your cake and eat itPeru’s Vice Ministry of Interculturalism is currently carrying out a project to protect Territorial Reserves for Indigenous Peoples living in voluntary isolation or in initial contact. The US$1 million project is funded by the Inter-American Development Bank.

Part of the project will include an an analysis of carbon stocks with a view to developing REDD projects to fund protection of the reserves. Of course, this is the same Inter-American Development Bank that helped finance the Camisea gas project – 75% of which is inside one of the reserves that the IDB is now supposed to be protecting. The Nahua/Kugapakori Reserve was established in 1990 to protect the Nahua and Kugapakori (also known as the Nanti) indigenous groups from the dangers of contact with Peruvian national society.

If you don’t stop being blind
To your sorrow you will find
You can’t have your cake and eat it
— Fats Waller: You can’t have your cake and eat it

The Camisea project (Lot 88) is one of the biggest gas projects in the Amazon. But it’s not big enough for the companies involved. Pluspetrol, an Argentine gas company, is planning to extend its operations into the Manú national park, a World Heritage Site that UNESCO describes as having biodiversity that “exceeds that of any other place on Earth”.

A report by consulting firm Quartz Services that was leaked to The Guardian explains,

“Our mission, as an institution providing specialist technical services to Pluspetrol, will be to contribute not only to the continuation of activities in Lot 88, but also to the development of the Manú National Park protected area. Pluspetrol has plans to do geological exploration in the River Maquizapango region and/or its surroundings, an area to the east of the Lot (88) and inside the Manú National Park.”

If Pluspetrol goes ahead with its plans, the impacts on the forests and the Indigenous Peoples living there would be devastating. In 2003, a Supreme Decree prohibited the expansion of the Camisea gas project within the Nahua/Kugapakori Reserve. In December 2012, four indigenous organisations in Peru, AIDESEP, FENAMAD, ORAU and COMARU, announced they will take legal action against the government and the companies involved over the planned expansion of Camisea.

Needless to say, the IDB-funded REDD project has nothing to say about stopping the expansion of gas operations inside Indigenous Peoples’ territory. The IDB’s REDD project document can be downloaded here (in Spanish, pdf file, 254.5 kB). The project has four components:

  1. Studies for inspection and categorisation of Indigenous Peoples living in voluntary isolation: studies for five new reserves, including Napo-Tigre reserve where Anglo-French oil company Perenco is operating, close to the border with Ecuador and Yasuni. Studies would also look at Nahua/Kugapakori Reserve (threatened by the expansion of Camisea) and four more reserves to “upgrade” them to Indigenous Reserves (a more secure category of indigenous reserves), and cartographic studies for these five reserves.
  2. Communication and awareness strategy: includes hiring a consulting firm to design a communication strategy about Indigenous Peoples living in voluntary isolation in Peru, aimed at the general population of Peru and communities living near the reserves.
  3. Pilot project for the protection of the Madre de Dios Territorial Reserve.
  4. An analysis of avoided deforestation in the Indigenous Reserves: including a carbon stocks inventory and a financial strategy based on REDD carbon credits.

The Inter-American Development Bank and the Peruvian government helped extract the gas below the Nahua/Kugapakori Reserve without asking the people who live there first or worrying too much about endangering their lives. Now they want the carbon credits from Indigenous Peoples’ forests, while doing nothing to prevent the expansion of gas exploration and extraction.
 


PHOTO Credit: Survival International.
 

1 thought on “Gas extraction and REDD in Peru: You can’t have your cake and eat it”

  1. Chris Lang says:
    15 February 2013 at 7:57 pm

    Good news! It looks like Pluspetrol will not be allowed to pursue its expansion plans. See this press release from Survival International:

    SURVIVAL INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE

    February 15, 2013

    SUCCESS: Gas giant backtracks on exploration in UNESCO World Heritage Site

    The Argentine gas giant Pluspetrol has publicly backtracked on plans to expand the notorious Camisea gas project in southeast Peru into one of the most biodiverse places on earth, following a shock exposure this week by The Guardian newspaper and Survival International.

    The company has released a statement in which it admitted planning what it described as ‘superficial geological studies… for scientific interest,’ in Manu National Park, but promising that it had now abandoned these plans.

    The Peruvian national parks authority Sernanp has also released a statement following the media storm, confirming it had denied Pluspetrol’s request to work in the area on the grounds that the Manu’s protected status ‘expressly prohibits the exploitation of natural resources’.

    For the full press release, click here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam
  • Bobby on Living Investments UK and Hyperion Management are boiler room scams that offered investments in teak plantations in Costa Rica. But will the UK authorities take any action?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP19 Warsaw COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!