Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Indonesian court revokes oil palm concession in Tripa peat swamp

Posted on 7 September 20128 October 2012

Indonesian court revokes oil palm concession in Tripa peat swamp

The Medan State Administrative Court has instructed Aceh Governor Zaini Abdullah to revoke a controversial oil palm concession in the Tripa peat swamp in Aceh province. This legal decision could signify an important breakthrough in stopping Indonesia’s forest destruction.

In August 2011, Irwandi Yusuf, Aceh’s then-governor, signed a permit for palm oil company PT Kallista Alam to convert 1,605 hectares of forest on the Trip peat swamp to oil palm plantations. The concession was awarded despite the fact that it was clearly part of the moratorium on new forest concession, that had been signed by Indonesia’s President only three months earlier.

Every six months, the moratorium map is revised. In the version published in November 2011, PT Kalista Alam’s concession area had disappeared from the area covered by the moratorium.

Friends of the Earth Indonesia (WALHI) Aceh sued the Governor of Aceh and PT Kalista Alam to revoke the concession, but the Banda Aceh State Administrative Court rejected the case in April 2012.

The Medan State Administrative Court (PTTUN Medan) ruled on the case following an appeal by WALHI Aceh. The decision is available here (pdf file, 225.8 kB, in Bahasa Indonesian). In a statement, Teuku Muhammad Zulfikar, the Director of WALHI Aceh, said,

“WALHI Aceh welcomes the decision of PTTUN Medan and requested that the Governor of Aceh immediately follow up the decision by as soon as possible revoking the business license of PT. Kalista Alam plantation in the Rawa Tripa forests.”

WALHI’s National Executive Director, Abetnego Tarigan explained the importance of the decision:

“The decision of PTTUN Medan is a jurisprudence for the enforcement of environmental law and environmental conservation efforts in Indonesia, which has almost never taken side with the environment and the people.”

The decision is an important victory for the NGOs and local communities campaigning to stop the destruction of the forests of the Tripa Peat Swamp. The REDD+ Task Force also welcomed the court’s decision. In a statement, Mas Achmad Santosa, the Chair of the Working Group of Legal Review and Law Enforcement of the REDD+ Task Force, said,

“This decision is in line with our recommendation because the land utilisation permit granted to PT. Kalista Alam was based on invalidated location permit (izin lokasi) and is included in the Indicative Moratorium Map (IMM). So, we hope there will be no more mismanagement in the process of permit issuance.”

Important as this decision is, it’s too soon to describe it as a turning point for Indonesia’s forests. Earlier this week, Greenomics Indonesia’s coordinator, Vanda Mutia Dewi, told the Jakarta Post that “The Forestry Ministry is currently lobbying the new Aceh administration to reactivate the HPH [production forest concessions], which was earlier suspended during Irwandi Yusuf’s administration.”

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Forestry continues to hand out permits to convert forests. So far this year, the Ministry has issued permits for 342,709 hectares of forest, according to the Jakarta Globe. Last year, the figure was 366,259 hectares. In 2010, while the US$1 billion REDD deal with Norway was being negotiated permits covering an area of only 8,613 hectares were issues. In 2009, the Ministry issued permits covering a staggering 4.9 million hectares. When the moratorium expires next year, will the Ministry of Forestry simply return to business as usual?

2 thoughts on “Indonesian court revokes oil palm concession in Tripa peat swamp”

  1. Dr. Nigel Miles says:
    7 September 2012 at 4:01 pm

    Maybe it was because of the lawsuit for over $100 billion that the national government is “showing its teeth” over the claim against AP and P in Riau province that it is now listening to both local communities and global responisibilities which we would all like to give support. When carbon et al is priced realistically it will outcompete ANY agricultural crop in its true value…..Q.E.D.

  2. Regan Heavey says:
    23 September 2012 at 2:27 am

    This could be a victory – I hope it succeeds!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!