Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Dennis Melka

Dennis Melka: Exporting deforestation from Sarawak to Peru

Posted on 26 September 20158 June 2021

Under the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Peru aims to preserve 54 million hectares of forest. Under a 2014 REDD agreement with Norway and Germany, Peru pledged to reduce net deforestation to zero by 2021. Yet deforestation continues.

In April 2015, a company called United Cacao Limited hit the headlines internationally, following a report by the Environmental Investigation Agency. The Guardian reported that United Cacao was responsible for “illegally clearing swathes of rainforest in the Peruvian Amazon”.

United Cacao had cleared an area of 2,126 hectares of primary forest near Tamshiyacu in Loreto region, northeastern Peru. The deforestation took place between May 2013 and August 2014.

In August 2014, Peru’s government had ordered United Cacao to stop the forest clearing, but in April 2015, a court ruled that the clearing was legal.


UPDATE – 5 October 2015: The case has not yet been concluded. In April 2015, Julio Guzmán, Prosecutor for Peru’s Ministry of the Environment, submitted an appeal to a higher court.


The ambiguities, loopholes and weaknesses in Peru’s legal framework and environmental procedures enable illegal deforestation to take place. The reality on the ground is in direct contrast to the government’s lofty international statements about reaching “zero net emissions from land use change and forestry in Peru by 2021”.

Recent satellite images published by Monitoring of the Andean Amazon (MAAP) show that a further 126 hectares was cleared between June and August 2015:

Dennis Melka

United Cacao: Listed in London, registered in the Cayman Islands, deforesting in Peru

United Cacao is listed on the London Stock Exchange and on the Lima Stock Exchange.

United Cacao is part of the Melka Group. In its report, the Environmental Investigation Agency describes the Melka Group as “a network of companies linked to massive deforestation and corrupt land deals in Malaysia”. The Melka Group’s corporate structure is opaque, involving a series shell companies and offshore accounts.

United Cacao is registered in the tax haven of the Cayman Islands. The company has even managed to make an agreement with the Cayman Islands’ government, which states that any tax laws enacted in the next 20 years will not apply to United Cacao.

The Melka Group has acquired 450 plots of mostly forested private land in the Peruvian Amazon. It is already operating on 7,000 hectares of forest and has requested almost 100,000 hectares of public land from the Peruvian government.

Dennis Melka is the Chief Executive Office of United Cacao. He says United Cacao, “seeks to become the world’s largest producer of ethically and sustainably produced cacao”. In March 2015, he gave an interview in which he attacks his critics:

Dennis MelkaAll these really radical NGO groups will say “Oh my goodness, deforestation, rainforest.” I think it’s important to note that by the time the plantation companies actually get to the land, that land has been logged, or clearcut of all tropical hardwoods. There is simply, it is not a rainforest, it’s a secondary forest, it’s a highly degraded area. So I think there is a confusion about actually what rainforest is.

If there is any confusion, it’s entirely on Melka’s part. This satellite image unambiguously shows forests cleared to make way for United Cacao’s plantations:

Dennis Melka

The World Resources Institute, the NGO that produced these images, is rarely (if ever) described as a “really radical NGO”.

Neither is the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), which commented as follows on Melka’s operations in Peru in a report this year:

Local people in Iquitos were shocked when a newly cleared area was discovered by accident in Tamshiyacu, quite close to the city. This was one of Melka’s properties (for cocoa), but he had not received permission to deforest, as reported by the local paper (La Región 2013a). La Región followed this report with two more studies of the impending deforestation, described as “deplorable”, “fatal” and irrecoverable” (La Region 2013 b,c), and echoed in Pickett (2013) and Dammert (2013).

Melka’s record of destruction in Sarawak

Melka is no stranger to deforestation. In October 2009, he registered a company called Asian Plantations Limited in Singapore. By the time he sold the company to Felda Global Ventures in 2014, Asian Plantations owned 24,000 hectares of land for plantation development. The company’s share price had tripled and its annual revenue was almost US$24 million.

EIA looked into Asian Plantations’ plantation operations in Sarawak:

EIA’s research revealed the group’s involvement in large-scale land acquisitions of forested land, expansive deforestation, a complicated ownership structure, and the use of offshore tax havens as the location for the ultimate parent company of the group. Asian Plantations Ltd. was set up to acquire land and quickly profit from it…

Asian Plantations’ chairman, Leonard Linggi, has a history of getting his hands on logging concession in return for political favours to Sarawak’s ruling elite. EIA found that,

areas which correspond to four of Asian Plantation Ltd.’s five plantation land holdings are the same as those which appear as land transactions with companies owned by political allies and family members of the former Sarawak Chief Minister, Taib Mahmud.

Asian Plantations did not buy land in Sarawak directly, but did so through a network of subsidiaries. Three holding companies bought Malaysian companies that held the concessions. This multi-level, non-transparent corporate structure makes finding out the owners of concession more difficult, and helps Asian Plantations evade responsibility for deforestation.

In Peru, Melka is using a similar corporate model, through United Cacao and United Oils, both of which are registered in the Cayman Islands. His model of deforestation is also the same.
 

2 thoughts on “Dennis Melka: Exporting deforestation from Sarawak to Peru”

  1. Chris Lang says:
    27 September 2015 at 1:31 pm

    For those who speak Spanish, here’s a report about one of Melka’s oil palm operations in Ucayali:

    Empresas de palma aceitera causan devastación y muerte en selva de Ucayali

    And a Peruvian TV programme broadcast in August 2015:

  2. Wes says:
    29 September 2015 at 9:05 pm

    You can’t reduce supply in one venue and not expect the demand to be met by production in another venue. The current supply side approach and only looking at leakage through a geographical key hole is seriously flawed. (or fraught with cognitive dissonance to use a currently popular term)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Julien Kokelberg on Diffraction Limited: Another carbon credit boiler room bites the dust
  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Julien Kokelberg on Diffraction Limited: Another carbon credit boiler room bites the dust
  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • George Wolfe on The Carbon Credit Registry carbon credit “reformatting” scam continues: A company calling itself Williams & Gray is running a recovery room scam

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Coalition for Rainforest Nations Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FPIC FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Green Resources Guest post HBS Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon China Colombia Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union Finland France Gabon Germany Ghana Guyana India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone South Africa Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2026 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!