Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor
Verra

Verra prohibits tokenisation of retired offsets. Toucan welcomes the news

Posted on 29 May 202229 May 2022

By Chris Lang

In October 2021, a crypto company called Toucan set up a process to “bridge” carbon offsets onto the blockchain as tokens called “Base Carbon Tonnes”. As part of the process, the carbon offsets were retired on the Verra registry. Since then, Toucan has tokenised about 22 million carbon offsets.

Verra prohibits tokenisation

Last week, Verra announced that,

Verra will, effective immediately, prohibit the practice of creating instruments or tokens based on retired credits, , on the basis that the act of retirement is widely understood to refer to the consumption of the credit’s environmental benefit.

As a result of Verra’s announcement, the price of Toucan’s Base Carbon Tonnes fell rapidly:

Verra prohibits tokenisation

The price of Base Carbon Tonnes (BCT) has fallen from a high of US$8.31 at the end of November 2021 to today’s price of US$2.14.

Toucan’s system has mainly be used to create new tokens called KlimaDAO. The price of KlimaDAO also fell after Verra’s announcement. The price of KlimaDAO has collapsed from a high of US$3,681 at the end of October 2021, down to today’s price of US$4.89.

“It’s mind frying”

According to an S&P Global article about Verra’s announcement,

The decision, which was made by Verra’s board of directors in April, is an attempt to eliminate confusion in the voluntary carbon marketplace. Verra wants to ensure that the retirement of a carbon credit has a singular meaning: that a credit’s environmental benefit has been exhausted after being used to offset a company’s emissions. The emergence of Toucan, however, distorts that meaning by giving life to a digital ghost of that credit in the form of a BCT that is then traded as a digital commodity.

Robin Rix, Verra’s chief legal, policy and markets officer, sums up the situation very well in a comment to S&P Global:

“It’s mind frying. Carbon credits themselves are abstract intangible things based on counterfactuals of things that you can’t actually see – emissions. And then crypto is another layer of abstraction on top of that.”

Rix told S&P Global that Verra will look at each request to retire offsets to check whether this is an attempt to tokenise the offset. Exactly how Verra will do this, Rix does not explain.

Don’t say “retiring”. Do say “immobilizing”

Verra gets most of its money from the fees it charges on sales of carbon offsets from its registry. In 2019, Verra had a revenue of US$13.9 million. Of this, Verra raised US$11.8m million from fees on carbon offsets and related services.

Obviously, Verra doesn’t want to shut down the income stream from fees on carbon offsets. So Verra has come up with a new concept. Welcome to “immobilized” carbon offsets:

Verra intends to explore the possibility of “immobilizing” credits in accounts in the Verra Registry so that they can be tokenized with the transparency and traceability that market participants demand, provided that this can be done in a way that prevents fraud and upholds environmental integrity.

Verra is starting a public consultation focussing on the following:

  1. What enabling measures should be implemented to responsibly associate Verra instruments with crypto instruments or tokens, such as custody or keyholder arrangements;
  2. What know-your-customer (KYC) checks should be conducted on issuers and/or holders of crypto instruments or tokens;
  3. How the Verra Registry Terms of Use should be amended;
  4. What fee schedule, if any, is appropriate for Verra to charge in relation to crypto instruments and tokens.

Rix told the Wall Street Journal that, “When the Verra registry was created . . . no one was thinking tokens, no one was thinking crypto. This presents a big risk in the market.”

Toucan welcomes Verra’s announcement

In a blog post about the announcement, Toucan’s Rob and johnx25bd write that:

Toucan welcomes this announcement from Verra, which comes after a lengthy dialogue and close contact between Verra, multiple other carbon market stakeholders and us.

Obviously, if Toucan said anything else, that would create “FUD” or fear, uncertainty, and doubt. That’s what crypto proponents describe anything that highlights the problems with crypto. And dismissing genuine problems as FUD is about the only thing keeping crypto afloat.

Apparently Toucan previously referred to Verra’s “immobilized” state for offsets that are to be bridged onto the blockchain as a “tokenized” state. Toucan seems determined to turn up the heat on all of our frying minds:

Verra prohibits tokenisationIntroducing this designation for credits held on the Verra registry would allow for these credits to be safely transferred to another registry (like Toucan’s) without risks of double counting. Even better, connecting our registries in this way opens the door to a process where tokenized credits could be transferred back from a blockchain onto their source registry.

This approach would enable all voluntary carbon credits to gain the benefits of tokenization on a public blockchain, including immediate global settlement, double spend protection, transparent traceability, enhanced market access and connections to decentralized finance (DeFi) applications.

Of course, none of this bridging, tokenisation, blockchain, and general cryptoclownery does anything to address the problems with carbon offsets. The reality remains that carbon offsets are a dangerous distraction from real solutions to the climate crisis.

Carbon trading (or as Verra’s Robin Rix puts it, trading “abstract intangible things based on counterfactuals of things that you can’t actually see”) whether on or off the blockchain, will do nothing to help find ways of leaving fossil fuels in the ground. On the contrary, it is a way of allowing Big Polluters to continue business as usual.

 


PHOTO Credit: Fabian Jones on Unsplash.
 

1 thought on “Verra prohibits tokenisation of retired offsets. Toucan welcomes the news”

  1. Kathleen McCroskey says:
    1 June 2022 at 5:44 am

    Obviously, if an offset has been “used”, in other words, applied to actually “offset” an emission, there should be no possible or ethical way to re-package and re-use it a second time! It should be erased from the books and it’s land-base (if there ever was one), permanently closed to re-selling offsets.
    Watch, carefully, as I move these cups around – now tell me which one has the pea under it. Wrong – there’s now a pea under every cup! It’s just like magic!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE!

Recent themes
30x30
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Recent Posts

  • REDD-Monitor is moving to Substack
  • REDD Project in Brazil Nut concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru finally started paying communities a decade after the project started. “I’m still lacking money,” says one community member
  • REDD-Monitor’s top ten posts in 2022
  • The harsh reality of 30×30: The EU is keen to allow extractivism in the 30×30 target – but not Indigenous Peoples’ territories
  • Human rights abuses against Indigenous Peoples and the proposed “30×30” target

Recent Comments

  • Ben on Response from Kurt Kaiser, Director of Compass Carbon: “Your article was of great concern to us”. And some questions for Kaiser from REDD-Monitor
  • James Mewa Kamaya on Papua New Guinea’s Forest Authority cancels Mayur Resources’ Kamula Doso REDD project
  • Benedikt von Butler on Switzerland’s offsetting deal with Peru excludes REDD. It will still not reduce emissions
  • Chris Ibe on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Xindia on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation EcoPlanet Bamboo Evictions FCPF Financing REDD Fossil fuels FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post Human rights ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC Verra World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Gabon Germany Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Spain Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA West Papua
©2025 REDD-Monitor | Powered by SuperbThemes!