Skip to content

Menu

Start here
About REDD-Monitor
REDD: An introduction
Contact

2020-09-16-184642_1920x1080_scrot

Tweet about this on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Facebook

Email this to someone

Tweet about this on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Facebook

Email this to someone

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

email address

Search for:

Recent themes

REDDisms

“The rejection of REDD is for the patrimony. Having accepted it would have complicated life for future generations. Why? Because the land is ours. We are bound and obliged to leave it for perpetual use. REDD would have been a betrayal for the long-term, with many consequences – cultural ones, but even more, our possibility to be a people, to be a nation. It would have been the end of us as a people.”

— Inatoy Sidsagi, Kunarevolution, September 2013

Recent Comments

Kathleen McCroskey on Marseille Manifesto: A people’s manifesto for the future of conservation
Kathleen McCroskey on NGOs warn of the dangers of Nature-based Solutions: “Carbon dioxide removals do not offset fossil fuel emissions”
Kathleen McCroskey on Indonesia scraps US$1 billion REDD deal with Norway
Francesco on Greenpeace calls for phasing out of fossil fuels. “Offsetting allows big polluters to delay and distract from reducing their own emissions”
Geoffrey Kemp on Greenpeace calls for phasing out of fossil fuels. “Offsetting allows big polluters to delay and distract from reducing their own emissions”

Recent Posts

Papua New Guinea NGO letter: NIHT Inc “is a big concern for its breaches of legal and proper process”
Marseille Manifesto: A people’s manifesto for the future of conservation
NGOs warn of the dangers of Nature-based Solutions: “Carbon dioxide removals do not offset fossil fuel emissions”
Greenpeace calls for phasing out of fossil fuels. “Offsetting allows big polluters to delay and distract from reducing their own emissions”
A trillion trees: A backstory featuring Felix Finkbeiner and Thomas Crowther

Recent Comments

Kathleen McCroskey on Marseille Manifesto: A people’s manifesto for the future of conservation
Kathleen McCroskey on NGOs warn of the dangers of Nature-based Solutions: “Carbon dioxide removals do not offset fossil fuel emissions”
Kathleen McCroskey on Indonesia scraps US$1 billion REDD deal with Norway
Francesco on Greenpeace calls for phasing out of fossil fuels. “Offsetting allows big polluters to delay and distract from reducing their own emissions”
Geoffrey Kemp on Greenpeace calls for phasing out of fossil fuels. “Offsetting allows big polluters to delay and distract from reducing their own emissions”

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua

©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!