Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Norway is planning to pay Indonesia for fudging its REDD carbon accounting

Posted on 27 March 20198 November 2019
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

On 16 February 2019 in Jakarta, Norway’s Minister of Climate and Environment, Ola Elvestuen, and Indonesia’s Minister of Environment and Forestry, Siti Nurbaya Bakar, announced that Norway is planning to make a payment for reduced emissions from deforestation to Indonesia.

The payment is based on Indonesia’s figures for carbon emissions from deforestation, which fell in 2017. It would be the first payment for reduced emissions under the Norway-Indonesia US$1 billion REDD deal, signed in May 2010.

The director of Rainforest Foundation Norway, Øyvind Eggen, welcomed the news. In a statement he said that,

Øyvind Eggen“This is fantastic news for the climate, for the world’s animal and plant species and for the millions of people who depend on these forests….

“We had not come this far today if it hadn’t been for the Norwegian International Climate and Forest Initiative. This collaboration has put rainforest conservation high on the political agenda in Indonesia, led to better forest management and strengthened the rights of those who protect the forests and whose livelihoods depend on them.”

The Norwegian Embassy in Jakarta put out a statement about the proposed payment. In it, Siti Nyurbaya states that the slower rate of deforestation is the result of policies put in place by President Joko Widodo:

Siti Nyurbaya“I am glad during the last four years, the Indonesian government led by President Joko Widodo has managed to undertake a series of corrective measures in the forest and land use sector. The bold measures have resulted in significant reduction of deforestation, forest degradation, as well as GHG emissions.”
 

The Norwegian Embassy’s statement explains that, an “independent third-party verification” of Indonesia’s emission figures will be carried out before the payment is made. According to Indonesia’s figures, the first payment would be for 4.8 million tons of CO2.

Indonesia will set aside 20% of the emissions reductions to account for uncertainty. The country will keep 15% to count towards its own emissions reduction target. Norway will pay for part of the emissions reductions and the remainder will be available to “other financiers”.

Emissions from peatlands excluded

The Norwegian Embassy’s statement includes an extraordinary admission about Indonesia’s figures of greenhouse gas emissions – the figures do not include emissions from peatlands:

Emission reductions from peat degradation and peat fires will be included in the results protocol in the near future, as estimates improve.

In other words, emissions from peatlands are not included in Indonesia’s figures for its greenhouse gas emissions.

That’s a problem, to say the least.

For the past 20 years, the palm oil industry has cleared vast areas of Indonesia’s forest and drained peat swamps to make way for its plantations. In a recent report, Greenpeace describes plantation development as “a root cause of Indonesia’s forest and peatland fires, with many fires started deliberately to clear land before planting”.

The exclusion of emissions from peatlands makes a mockery of Norway’s proposed “results-based payment”.

A spokesperson for the Norwegian Climate Ministry told Development Today that measuring emissions from peatlands is difficult. “Indonesia has done a great job in developing better methods and is making progress,” he said, adding that the figures “are not accurate enough to form the basis for payments.”

As Development Today comments, “If emissions from peatlands had been counted, there might be no basis for payment at all.”

A “crucial time”

In its article about the proposed payment to Indonesia, Development Today refers to a recent evaluation of the Indonesia-Norway US$1 billion REDD deal. The evaluation notes the reduced rate of tree cover loss (based on Global Forest Watch data) in 2017.

The evaluation report states that “while the effects of drought cessation cannot be ruled out entirely”, the reduction in deforestation “may well be due” to improvements in forest management.

An article on CIFOR’s Landscape News website also notes the role the weather played in Indonesia’s reduced deforestation, along with lower palm oil prices:

A wetter rainy season that helped dampen forest fires and lower palm oil prices, in turn diminishing incentives to develop more palm oil plantations, also contributed the country’s decrease in tree loss in 2017.

The evaluation report suggests that payments could start in 2019:

[I]f publicly committed in 2019, this first CfR [Contribution for Results] payment would raise awareness of the Indonesian response to the climate challenge in general, and of the Partnership and its work in particular, at a crucial time in the Indonesian and Norwegian electoral cycles.

This wouldn’t be the first time that Norway has timed its REDD payments to coincide with national elections. In 2015, Norway paid US$40 million to Guyana, just before the elections in that country. Indonesia’s elections will take place on 17 April 2019.

The evaluation report also suggests that a payment to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the signing of the Letter of Intent for the US$1 billion REDD deal could “attract media attention”:

This would recognise the progress made and the recent decline in deforestation rate, maintain momentum, and raise awareness of the climate change response. A first results based payment would test the calculation, disbursement and distribution systems, and could also (especially if made on 26 May 2020, the LoI’s tenth anniversary) attract media attention. The implication is that 2019-2020 will be a decisive moment for which specific preparation is needed.

 


PHOTO Credits: Greenpeace: Indonesia’s forest fires – 19-21 September 2015.
 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“They [oil companies] will continue extracting whether I talk to them or not. If by talking to them, I can manage to convince them to restore millions of hectares of land, there can still be a benefit somewhere. The point is that tree planting is not as simple as it looks.”

— Robert Nasi, director general of CIFOR, November 2020

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!