Skip to content

Menu

Start here
About REDD-Monitor
REDD: An introduction
Contact

2016-03-15-162604_1094x1021_scrot

Tweet about this on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Facebook

Email this to someone

Tweet about this on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Facebook

Email this to someone

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

email address

Search for:

Recent themes

REDDisms

“California’s cap-and-trade program has raised billions of dollars since its launch through the auction of pollution permits. But so far, the program is not a major driver of cuts in greenhouse gases – most of which are being achieved through other, more traditional regulations including those on fuels, vehicles and power generation.”

— Anna M. Phillips, Alexa Díaz, and Tony Barboza, Los Angeles Times, October 2019

Recent Comments

Chris Lang on REDD notes: 6 July 2020
D Morey on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
John Dick on Ten pitfalls of massive tree planting campaigns like the World Economic Forum’s trillion trees initiative
matthew c le merle on How many “successful” REDD projects are there? Verra claims “more than 150”, but the reality is only 32 (according to Verra’s own project database)
Anderson Alexandre on More on the D’Cerrado a’Amazonia REDD project in Brazil. Featuring SSO International Capital, LiveHOPE Fund, GHG Emissions Corp., RTD SPV1 LLC, and Brazil Mata Viva

Recent Posts

REDD notes: 21 September 2020
Ten pitfalls of massive tree planting campaigns like the World Economic Forum’s trillion trees initiative
The Green Climate Fund Board discussion about Colombia’s REDD+ funding proposal: Concerns about environmental integrity, “could have been funded by the GCF outside of the REDD+ pilot programme”, reservations about GCF’s REDD+ scorecard, Colombia is not a high forest low deforestation country, and any emissions reductions already reversed. The Board approved funding anyway
REDD notes: 14 September 2020
A critical revision of REDD from an intersectional gender perspective

Recent Comments

Chris Lang on REDD notes: 6 July 2020
D Morey on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
John Dick on Ten pitfalls of massive tree planting campaigns like the World Economic Forum’s trillion trees initiative
matthew c le merle on How many “successful” REDD projects are there? Verra claims “more than 150”, but the reality is only 32 (according to Verra’s own project database)
Anderson Alexandre on More on the D’Cerrado a’Amazonia REDD project in Brazil. Featuring SSO International Capital, LiveHOPE Fund, GHG Emissions Corp., RTD SPV1 LLC, and Brazil Mata Viva

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua

©2020 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!