Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • REDD in the news
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Why did Norway agree to pay US$40 million just before Guyana’s election?

Posted on 12 May 20157 August 2018
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

On 8 May 2015, the Government of Guyana put out a press release announcing that Norway had agreed a further US$40 million “for maintaining low deforestation rates and improving forest governance”.

The timing could not have been better for the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C), the country’s ruling party for the past 23 years. Norway’s generosity was announced just three days before Guyana’s general election.

President Donald Ramotar was quick to cash in on the opportunity. On 7 May 2015, he gave a televised statement:

“All Guyanese should feel proud of the vote in confidence expressed by Norway in announcing that they are willing to pursue a second agreement up to 2020, a policy that only the PPP/C supports in Guyana. And all Guyanese should feel proud that we have earned the most money from a forest partnership in the world, after Brazil, money that is being directly spent on the people.”

On 9 May 2015, a full-page advert appeared in both the Stabroek News and the Kaieteur News (APNU-AFC is the opposition coalition, A Partnership for National Unity and Alliance For Change):

In November 2014, President Ramotar suspended parliament in order to avoid MPs passing a no-confidence vote against his government. He did so using a constitutional technique called “proroguing” to suspend parliament for up to six months. The opposition controlled parliament before Ramotar suspended it. Among the opposition’s demands are more transparent accounting of government spending.

So the last two agreements of payments from Norway to Guyana took place with a suspended parliament in Guyana. These payments included an US$80 million payment to the Inter-American Development Bank for the hugely controversial Amaila Falls hydropower dam.

Outreach Strategies

Into this political imbroglio comes a Washington DC-based PR company called Outreach Strategies. The company’s website tells us that,

“We are a mission-driven communications and public affairs firm that designs and promotes positive change on large-scale environmental and natural resource challenges.”

Previous clients of Outreach Strategies include Environmental Defense Fund, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (project goal: “to raise the profile of WBCSD and the role of business at Rio+20”), KPMG, and the US Climate Action Partnership (which features planet savers like AES, Alcoa, Chrysler, Dow Chemicals, Rio Tinto, and Shell).

On 8 May 2015, I received a tweet featuring a lovely info-graphic about REDD+ in Guyana. It came from Katie Sarro who recently moved from the World Business Council for Sustainable Development to Outreach Strategies.

I asked her who is paying Outreach Strategies for their PR work on behalf of the Government of Guyana. “That info is public domain per gov requirement,” she replied. As that’s not an answer to the question, I asked again. Sarro sent a link to politico.com – here’s the statement in full:

The Office of Climate Change in Guyana has brought on Outreach Strategies to develop a communications strategy “to build a better global understanding of Guyana’s low-carbon development” efforts.

So far, Sarro has not responded to my question about whether Norway is paying Outreach Strategies for its PR work on behalf of Guyana’s 23-year ruling party.
 


PHOTO Credit: Pete Oxford.

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

1 thought on “Why did Norway agree to pay US$40 million just before Guyana’s election?”

  1. Chris Lang says:
    14 May 2015 at 11:28 am

    The EU withheld aid to Guyana, until after the election…

    EU to withhold $37M in aid until Guyana holds elections

    AP, April 25, 2015 12:58 PM

    GEORGETOWN, Guyana (AP) — Guyana’s British high commissioner says the European Union will not release $37 million in aid until the South American country has a functioning Parliament.

    James Quinn told reporters late Friday that the money will likely be released after the May 11 general elections. The majority of the money is slated to help boost Guyana’s sugar production and the remainder to protect low-lying coastal areas from flooding.

    President Donald Ramotar had suspended the opposition-controlled legislature in November to avoid a no-confidence vote and later dissolved it ahead of the elections.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“We have now passed the event horizon into a world run by Dr. Pangloss. In a Sunday afternoon post, Paul Krugman enthusiastically endorses an IMF presentation by Larry Summers which depicts asset bubbles as necessary and desirable. And that means they both agree they should not only continue, they should be encouraged.”

— Yves Smith, Naked Capitalism, November 2013

Recent Posts

  • Launched at COP25, IETA’s Markets for Natural Climate Solutions is greenwash for the oil industry
  • REDD in the news: 2-8 December 2019
  • Radio 4’s Anatomy of a Fraud: Featuring World Commodity Trading, Heritage FA, Eco-Synergies, IGL Labs UK, Diffraction Diamonds DMCC, Diffraction Limited, Citadel Trustees, and World Gemological Institute
  • Northern Powerhouse Developments: Another “investment” scheme promoted by Property Frontiers collapses
  • REDD in the news: 25 November – 1 December 2019

Recent Comments

  • Harvey Khaira on Peter Singh Virdee avoids extradition to Germany to face charges of VAT fraud on carbon credit sales. Virdee is now being investigated for corruption in the Caribbean
  • Marksie on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Chris Lang on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow
  • Chris Lang on James Moore found guilty of wire fraud and conspiracy in Renwick Haddow’s Bar Works investment scam
  • Fabio on Bar Works: The return of Renwick Haddow

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Cancun Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD+ Partnership REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2019 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!