• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

What if forests started dying because of climate change? Oh wait… they already are

Posted on 24 May 201211 May 2021

By Chris Lang

Little progress seems to have been made at the UN climate negotiations in Bonn over the past two weeks. Meanwhile, climate change is already having a serious impact on forests, through the increase in severity and frequency of droughts, fires and/or beetle attacks.

According to Dr Craig Allen, Forest Ecologist at the US Geological Survey, in North America, “We’re looking at tree mortality over a scale of tens of millions of hectares in the last decade alone.” The bad news is that this is typical of what’s happening around the world. In an interview recently on ABC Television, Allen explained that droughts and heat waves are triggering “mass waves of mortality”. He adds that, “No major forest type is immune.”

It’s not necessarily the drought that kills the tree. Allen explains that,

There may be insects and fungal pests that emerge at that point in time but underlying it is the physiological stress on the trees that compromises their defences… So what we’re seeing in these forest die-off events around the world are trees passing the tipping point of stress – the thresholds of mortality. Unfortunately we don’t know very much about these thresholds at this point.

The ABC programme can be viewed by clicking on the image below:

This programme focusses mainly on the impacts of climate change on trees and forests in Australia. Scientists have found that the numbers of insects attacking the trees is increasing. Dr George Matusick, a forest pathologist, says that,

The numbers are scary. Where we might have seen one, maybe two per square metre, now we’re seeing fifty, sixty, seventy, eighty. We’ve seen even as high as one hundred.

Scientists in the USA are seeing similar patterns. In March 2012, a study by scientists from the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, was published in the American Naturalist. The study looks at the mountain pine beetles that have killed large areas of pine forest in North America.

They found that mountain pine beetles are breeding twice a year:

Long thought to produce only one generation of tree-killing offspring annually, some populations of mountain pine beetles now produce two generations per year, dramatically increasing the potential for the bugs to kill lodgepole and ponderosa pine trees.

This means that there “could be to 60 times as many beetles attacking trees in any given year,” the scientists found. They point out the seriousness in terms of the climate of the mountain pine beetle [MPB] infestation:

The current MPB epidemic is the largest in history, extending from the Yukon Territory, Canada, to southern California and New Mexico…. To date, more than 13 million ha [hectares] of trees have been killed in British Columbia. The MPB-killed trees in British Columbia alone will release 990 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, an amount equal to five times the annual emissions from all forms of transportation in the country.

The 2005 drought in the Amazon led to the release of 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere. The 2010 drought was even worse, leading to as much as 2.2 billion tonnes of carbon being released.

As Joe Romm points out on Climate Progress, this is only the beginning of climate change feedbacks. In the USA,

we’ve only warmed about a degree Fahrenheit in the last few decades. Imagine the unexpected nonlinear impacts and feedbacks we face when we warm 10 times that this century, as we are likely to do if we keep listening to the do nothing or do little crowd.

The impacts of climate change on forests dramatically illustrate that doing something about climate change must mean reducing the amount of fossil fuel that is burned. There is no way of addressing climate change by trading the carbon stored in forests against continued emissions. Doing so will only accelerate the tipping point of the death of vast areas of the world’s forests.
 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities
  • Response from Steve Zwick, Verra: “Verra will ask Kanaka Management Systems to cease and desist any actions that may mislead communities into thinking that Verra has not already rejected the project”
  • Response from Kanaka Management Services: “Please do not conduct legal trail or castigate REDD+ project developers on the website by writing text which shows the project developer in bad light”

Recent Comments

  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Chris Lang on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!