Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Financial Services Authority: “Why you should be wary about investing in the carbon credit market”

Posted on 8 May 201219 March 2020

Financial Services Authority: Why you should be wary about investing in the carbon credit marketThe Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the UK has issued a new warning about the dangers of investors being duped by companies selling carbon credits.

The FSA has received many reports from people complaining or asking about firms promoting carbon credits in the UK. The FSA warning invites investors to, “Find out why you should be wary about investing in the carbon credit market.”

The FSA has nothing against carbon trading itself and notes that “there are many reputable firms operating in the sector”. The FSA’s warning is about “an increasing number of firms [that] are using dubious, high-pressure sales tactics and targeting vulnerable consumers”.

This is the second warning from the FSA about the risks of investing in carbon credits. In July 2011 complaints and queries about carbon credit trading schemes to the FSA grew ten-fold. The following month, the FSA issued a warning, pointing out that it “does not regulate the sale or trading of carbon credits”. Anyone can sell carbon credits, in other words and investors risk being ripped off:

“[I]t is often not made clear to investors that trading on these markets requires skill and experience.

“You may lose money on your investment by not being able to sell, or at least get a competitive rate, when trading a small volume of carbon credits.”

The companies selling carbon credits contact potential investors by phone, email or post. The FSA warns that,

“The caller may claim carbon credits are ‘the new big thing’ in commodity trading, industries now have to off-set their emissions, the government is focusing on green developments or that it is an ever growing market.”

REDD-Monitor collected the following three examples, more or less at random, from carbon traders’ websites. REDD-Monitor will leave it to you to decide whether these examples are the sort of dubious sales tactics that the FSA is warning about:

  1. “Barclays has predicted rises in carbon credits prices of up to 42% by 2012 with other major financial institutions such as CityGroup, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan all having begun to trade this exiting new commodity.”
  2. “Carbon is expected to become the world’s biggest commodity market, surpassing Oil in the next five years… There is no doubt that massive PROFITS will be made over the coming years.”
  3. “Carbon offsetting is set to be one of the largest global industries, estimated to be worth $3 trillion by 2020, twice the size of the oil industry.”

Predictably, none of these websites point out that the price of carbon on the European Trading Scheme has crashed.

The FSA warns particularly about voluntary emissions reductions (VERs), which are increasingly being offered to UK investors. VERs “are often labelled as ’certified’”, the FSA notes,

“but this certification is voluntary and involves a wide range of bodies and different quality standards that are not recognised by any UK financial compensation scheme.

“Also keep in mind that the projects generating VERs are usually based overseas and the UK authorities have no way of controlling the quality or validity of the schemes.”

The FSA maintains a list of unauthorised firms and individuals that investors should be “especially wary of”. 12 of the firms on the list have the word carbon in their names.

It’s hardly surprising that the FSA is concerned about the trade in carbon credits in the UK. It involves the sale of an invented commodity. While the buyer gets a pile of carbon credits and the seller gets a pile of money, no carbon changes hands. When you buy a carbon credit, you have to believe that emissions reductions genuinely took place (and that you’re not paying for a scam like the CDM credits created from destroying HFC-23). Then you have to take it on trust that the emissions reductions will remain reduced (and that, in the case of REDD credits, an oil palm company didn’t move in and clear the forest, or any other forest anywhere else).

If you were looking for a scam to part gullible people from their money, what more could you possibly ask for?
 

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

2 thoughts on “Financial Services Authority: “Why you should be wary about investing in the carbon credit market””

  1. Michael says:
    8 May 2012 at 4:22 pm

    About time.
    I get calls from these fraudsters all the time promising huge profits. These boiler rooms have nothing to do with the voluntary or regulatory carbon market. They operate blind pool ponzi schemes to draw in an every greater number of investors by creating fictitious profits on voluntary carbon certificates with peculiar names which are not recognized in the industry itself…

  2. Chris Lang says:
    8 May 2012 at 6:19 pm

    @Michael – Thanks for this. Have you reported the companies calling you to the FSA? Or you could at least write something on this website: lovemoney.com.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Kathleen McCroskey on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Recent Posts

  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance demands proper REDD safeguards and implementation of moratorium on voluntary carbon market REDD projects
  • “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Papua New Guinea Environmental Alliance letter to Pogio Ghate, Minister for Environment, Conservation and Climate Change
  • Ecomapuá Amazon REDD Project, Brazil: Pública investigation reveals Ecomapuá Conservação is selling “illegal” carbon offsets from land it does not own, without transferring the money to local communities

Recent Comments

  • Kathleen McCroskey on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid a on “REDD does nothing to address the crisis of endless economic growth.” Interview with Chris Lang, REDD-Monitor, by Fábio Alkmin, PhD student at the University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • shahid on James Moore sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for his role in the Bar Works scam
  • Kathleen McCroskey on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl
  • Delton Chen on Offsetting is not an option if we are serious about addressing the climate crisis. My response to Hartmut Graßl

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Green Climate Fund Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!