Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Guest Post: Women Remain Outside the Global Forest Estate

Posted on 11 August 201123 May 2019
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

The role of women in protecting and managing forests is often excluded from discussions about forests. The Rights and Resources Initiative points out in the guest post below that the story of women of indigenous and forest communities, who continue to lag far behind in securing tenure rights, remains largely untold.

In a similar vein, Jeannette Gurung from Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (WOCAN) recently carried out an assessment of gender issues in REDD for USAID. She and her colleagues asked community groups and organisations implementing REDD projects in Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal, Cambodia and Thailand about gender impacts. In an interview on CIFOR’s forest blog, she says that the most common reaction was “Oh – we forgot. We didn’t even think about these things.”

In an interview with REDD-Monitor earlier this year, Andy White coordinator of the Rights and Resources Initiative explained that

“the early evidence from the REDD strategies being developed around the world is that the most obvious and perhaps cheapest ways to reduce emissions (the goal of REDD programs) are usually either overlooked or discarded. And that is … suspending the industrial concessions for logging and conversion for agriculture and launching the tenure and governance reforms that will put forests into the hands of people who really own them and most often want to keep them forested.”

The development of the tenure and governance reforms that are needed to protect forests must include women.

GUEST POST by Rights and Resources Initiative
Women Remain Outside the Global Forest Estate

A study presented in July 2011 at the International Conference on Forest Tenure, Governance and Enterprise in Lombok, Indonesia, suggests that granting greater control to local forest communities has been a key element in the turn-around accomplished by China, South Korea, Vietnam and Nepal, which in the last 20 years have had significant success in re-gaining vast areas of forest.

Yet participants at the conference learned that there is one story that is not being told— that of the women of indigenous and forest communities, who continue to lag far behind in securing tenure rights.

“China made a huge success in forest land reform,” said Li Ping, a researcher with Landesa. “Land is allocated to individual households, and the rights are legally defined as property rights… But Chinese women tend to move to their husband’s village on marriage, and when they divorce, they tend to move back to their home village, but land cannot be moved.”

Avi Mahaningtyas of Kemitraan, an NGO that works for governance reform, noted that the REDD+ program in Indonesia has few indigenous women participants. “If you are a mother, you are number two; you are not the head of the family,” said Avi. “So even if policies are affirmative, how to implement them is a challenge… And when education level is low, it is likely that women will not be reached by government programs or forest-based development.”

To address these challenges, said Avi, it’s important to find new ways to draw out the women who are most affected by the tenure crisis, as they are often reluctant to speak out in the crowded setting of a consultation meeting.

In his opening talk at the conference, Rights and Resources Coordinator Andy White said women in the forest communities of the developing world have “weaker land rights and civil rights and are particularly vulnerable to all types of abuse.”

“This is a horrible scar on the forest sector, a blot on the historical record, and one we must deal with if we are to say with a straight face that we have achieved development in forest areas.”

In a forthcoming compilation of perspectives from throughout the Asia-Pacific region, the Rights and Resources Initiative begins to explore the underlying causes and possible solutions for issues of gender and forest tenure, including implications for the future of REDD in Asia.

For more information, please contact Jenna DiPaolo at or follow RRI on twitter @RightsResources.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“A significant amount of bad press associated with REDD+ and a number of stories and reports issued by organisations such as Greenpeace and REDD-Monitor focusing on issues such as indigenous rights, additionality and carbon credit scams has created negative connotations for REDD+ in the eyes of many private sector operators.”

— Tim Laing et al., “Understanding the demand for REDD+ credits”, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, May 2015

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!