Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Eliasch “not impressive” in front of environmental audit committee

Posted on 29 January 200919 September 2014

The UK news and current affairs magazine Private Eye reported recently on an appearance by Johan Eliasch in front of a Commons select committee. Private Eye notes that he seemed to have little interest in the matter under discussion.

Private Eye
No. 1266, 26 December 2008 – 8 January 2009, page 6

Swedish stockbroker Eliasch was a member of David Cameron’s big-money set until he unexpectedly jumped to Labour and was made Brown’s “Special Representative on Deforestation and Clean Energy”. When he appeared in front of the environmental audit committee the adjective should perhaps have been “silent” rather than “special”.

Eliasch has the personal satisfaction of having his name affixed to the grandly named “Eliasch Review” of rainforest financing which was launched a couple of months ago. But is it any more than an ego trip for the Swede?

At the environmental audit committee he spent much of the time gazing into the middle distance, picking food out of his teeth, looking at his heavy, silvery wristwatch and generally radiating immense boredom. Add to that his shaved head, guttural accent, a prosperous-looking suntan and a habit of shrugging when answering questions, and the no-doubt entirely unfortunate image was of some political blow-in who had little urgent interest in the subject. What he did say was either hard to understand or contained the fashionable bullshit word, “robust”.

Eliasch appeared alongside two civil servants from the Office of Climate Change. One of these was called Graham Floater – a good surname for someone studying global warming. Floater and his mate took most of the technical questions, Eliasch sitting between the two of them, gazing imperiously at nothing very much. All in all, not an impressive performance.

Immediately afterwards the committee heard from a couple of macrobiotic eco-activists, one from Greenpeace, the other from Friends of the Earth. They were much livelier and full of scorn for Eliasch. Alas, the prime minister’s special representative had not seen fit to hang about to listen to their interest. No doubt, he’d rushed off to save the world, or maybe earn himself a few bob on the stock market.

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Facebook

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Alan N. Connor on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Jeremy Sweet on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Chris Lang on Al Jazeera: Why are Tanzania’s Maasai being forced off their ancestral land?

Recent Posts

  • Statement from Kichwa Indigenous communities about the Cordillera Azul National Park REDD (PNCAZ) project: “No to the false climate solutions offered as ‘Nature Based Solutions’ and ‘carbon neutrality’ by oil and mining companies that pollute in other regions of the world, such as Shell, Total, BHP, and others, who buy carbon from the PNCAZ.”
  • 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Aby L. Sène on “Land Grabs and Conservation Propaganda” in Africa
  • NIHT Inc’s misleading statements about the company’s REDD operations in Papua New Guinea
  • Global Forestry Investments scam: Andrew Skeene and Omari Bowers sentenced to 11 years in prison

Recent Comments

  • Chris Lang on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Tom Rayner on Green IS Group: An FSC-certified Ponzi scheme
  • Alan N. Connor on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Jeremy Sweet on 30×30 target “not supported by the science”
  • Chris Lang on Al Jazeera: Why are Tanzania’s Maasai being forced off their ancestral land?

Issues and Organisations

30x30 AB 32 Andes Amazon Boiler rooms California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Cryptocurrency Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer The Nature Conservancy UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region Costa Rica DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sierra Leone Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2022 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!