Skip to content
Menu
REDD-Monitor
  • Start here
  • About REDD-Monitor
  • REDD: An introduction
  • Contact
REDD-Monitor

Stabilising the Climate through ‘Forests For People’ in Indonesia

Posted on 8 December 200819 September 2017
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Stabilising the Climate through Forests For People in IndonesiaWe have received the following position statement from the Consortium for the support of Community Based Forest Management, which sets out some key concerns and demands concerning the development of REDD in Indonesia.


 

Forest For People – Stabilising the Climate

Indonesia’s proposal for financing forest conservation and protection under the scheme of Reduced Emission from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD), or in other words “carbon trading”, has now become a national issue. Many stakeholders are busily preparing structures and infrastructures, so that this climate change mitigation scheme, based on voluntary obligations and market based economic mechanisms relating to global “environmental services”, can be implemented smoothly. One thing is certain: This development will trigger new forestry policies.

However, these enthusiastically embraced activities neglect the basic principles of Indonesian forestry, especially the rights of the local people to community based (local or traditional) land use and tenure.

The state claims sovereignty over the 143 million ha of Forest and Forest Area, leading to a large number of conflicts over land rights in these areas. On the other hand, the lives and existence of over 80 million Indonesians still depend on forests and forest resources.

For the sake of the democratisation of forest management in Indonesia and also for global climate justice, KpSHK (Consortium for the support of Community Based Forest Management) and all SHK groups (Community based Forest Management), together with participants from the civil society, pledge and call on all people of the world to demand

1. That local (traditional) communities be given priority and sovereignty over forest management in Indonesia;
2.To support the legal recognition of land use and land ownership rights over forests by local (traditional) communities;
3. That any national and international initiatives to reduce global warming and mitigate climate change which rely on forest ecology should be for the benefit of the local (traditional) communities.
4. That we together, side by side, participate in controlling the implementation of national and international initiatives for the reduction of global warming or climate change mitigation, so that these efforts will not be sacrificed to economic priorities;
5. That the citizens of industrial countries reduce their consumption of goods made from material from forests and forest lands in Indonesia.

With this “Forest for People” petition we express our hope for climate stabilisation. And we call on people all over the world to support “Forest for People” so that climate justice will be achieved.

Consortium for the support of Community Based Forest Management, Bogor, December 2008

Supported by:

1. SHK Community and Participant in 5 Big Islands of Indonesia
2. KpSHK-Bogor
3. Masyarakat Adat Tawana, Kecamatan Ulu Bongka, Kabupaten Touna Pripinsi Sulteng
4. Komunitas Taragahar Tajomosan, Kecamatan Waigete, Kabupaten Sika, Propinsi NTT
5. Komunitas Aceh Rayeuk, Kecamatan Lhoong, Kabupaten Aceh Besar, Propinsi NAD
6. Komunitas Rinjani, Kecamatan Sembalun, Kabupaten Lombok Timur, Propinsi NTB
7. Komunitas Semende Marga Ulunosal, Kecamatan Nasal, Kabupaten Kaur, Propinsi Bengkulu
8. Komunitas Meratus, Kecamatan Batang Alai Timur, Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Tengah Propinsi Kal Sel 9. Komunitas Rongkong, Kecamatan Limbong, Kabupaten Luwu Utara, Propinsi Sul Sel
10. Komunitas Masyarakat Adat Hoto’, Kecamatan Seko, Kabupaten Luwu Utara, Propinsi Sul Sel
11. Komunitas Erdas, Kecamatan Dusun Selatan, Kabupaten Barito Selatan, Propinsi Kalteng
12. Komunitas Gunung Betung, Kecamatan Padang Cermin, Kabupaten Lampung Selatan, Propinsi Bandar Lampung
13. Komunitas KTHR Sekar Pijer, Kecamatan Panggang, Kabupaten Gunung Kidul, Propinsi DI Yogyakarta
14. Komunitas DAS Tondano, Kabupaten Minahasa, Propinsi Sulawesi Utara
15. Komunitas Rengganis, Kecamatan Panti, Kabupaten Jember, Propinsi Jawa Timur
16. Komunitas Cirewed, Kecamatan Sukajaya, Kabupaten Bogor, Propinsi Jawa Barat
17. Komunitas Dayak Kutai Barat, Kabupaten Kutai Barat, Propinsi Kalimantan Timur
18. Komunitas Masyarakat Adat Lodang, Kecamatan Seko, Kabupaten Luwu Utara, Propinsi Sul Sel
19. Komunitas Rawa Taman Mahap, Menterap, Skadau, Kalimantan Barat
20. Komunitas Adat Talang Mamak, Riau

 

Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SUBSCRIBE!

Enter your email address to receive notification of new posts.

Recent themes
Natural Climate Solutions
WWF's conservation scandals
Aviation and offsetting
Conservation Watch

REDDisms

“The Conference will be fundamentally different from its predecessor, Rio 92. The Summit held 20 years ago represented the final stages of long negotiation processes that culminated in the signing of important documents and conventions. In turn, Rio+20 looks to the future, building a new sustainable development agenda. To the extent that Rio 92 was a point of destination, Rio+20 may be considered a point of departure.”

— Antonio de Aguiar Patriota, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Brazil, May 2012

Recent Posts

  • Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Peru cancels its World Bank FCPF Carbon Fund programme
  • The World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’s latest hot air scam: Retroactive credits
  • Some questions for Frithjof Finkbeiner, founder of Plant-for-the-Planet

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Charles Claxton on Graeme Biggar, Director-General of the UK’s National Economic Crime Centre: “There is not a sufficient deterrent for fraudsters and there is insufficient recourse for victims”
  • Chris Lang on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • Sam on Blackmore Bond collapse: Financial Conduct Authority is “responsible for every penny lost”
  • barrywarden on Coronavirus notes #7: How the Colombian government is rolling back social and environment safeguards during the pandemic
  • Chris Lang on Why has the Financial Conduct Authority not taken down the website of the clone scam “Good Investment Advisors”?

Issues and Organisations

AB 32 Boiler rooms Bonn California Can REDD save ... ? Carbon accounting Carbon Credits Carbon Offsets CDM Conservation-Watch Conservation International COP21 Paris Deforestation FCPF FERN Financing REDD Forest definition Fossil fuels FPP Friends of the Earth FSC Greenpeace Guest post ICAO Illegal logging Indigenous Peoples Natural Climate Solutions NGO statements Plantations Poznan R-M interview REDD and rights REDD in the news Risk RSPO-Watch Safeguards Sengwer Sustainable Forest Management The Nature Conservancy Ulu Masen UN-REDD UNFCCC World Bank WRM WWF

Countries

Australia Bolivia Brazil Cambodia Cameroon Canada China Colombia Congo Basin region DR Congo Ecuador El Salvador European Union France Germany Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Kenya Laos Luxembourg Madagascar Malaysia Mexico Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Republic of Congo Sweden Tanzania Thailand Uganda UK Uncategorized United Arab Emirates USA Vietnam West Papua
©2021 REDD-Monitor | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!